Recent Posts
Categories
Archives
Criminal Defense
Appeals / Post Convictions
Arson
Assault / Battery
Child Abuse
Criminal Threats
Domestic Violence
Drug Offenses
DUI Defense
Federal Crimes
Felony Defense
Fraud Crimes
Hate Crimes
Kidnapping
Murder / Manslaughter
Sex Crimes
Stalking
Theft Offenses
Third Strike Cases
Vehicular Manslaughter
Weapons Charges
White Collar Crimes
California State Crimes
Criminal Defense Videos
Legal Resources
Criminal Defense Blog
« Founder of an anti-drug program is arrested in Redondo Beach Police drug sting | Main  | Los Angeles Medical Marijuana Theft Crimes »
  California Supreme Court Rules that Juvenile "Strikes" Can be Used Under Three Strikes Law

The California Supreme Court held in the recent case of Superior Court v. Nguyen, that a juvenile who was adjudicated a ward of the court in Juvenile Court for a crime that would be considered a strike under California's Three Strike Laws will count as a strike if that juvenile offender commits another felony.  The 6-1 decision of the California Supreme Court now allows prosecutors to allege a prior juvenile strike for purposes of increasing the punishment on any new felony committed as an adult.

If you or someone you know is charged with a serious crime in juvenile court, it is more important than ever to seek strong legal counsel that understands the implications of a juvenile being charged with a serious felony. Unlike other juvenile cases, this new law allows a juvenile adjudication (conviction) to affect that juvenile through his/her adult life. Contact Robert M. Bernstein at (310) 477-1480 for a free consultation today.

Categories: Third Strike Law

Posted By Robert Bernstein  on August 14, 2009 03:42 pm | Permalink 
 
Attorney Web Design © 2010 All Rights Reserved.
The information on this Los Angeles Criminal Defense Attorney website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information on this website is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing of this information does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.